The Hidden Cost of Automation: How Ad Platforms Incentivize Junk Leads

Automation has changed the face of digital advertising. Platforms like Google Ads and Meta's suite of automated campaign types promise effortless optimization, better targeting, and more conversions. For many marketers, these tools deliver on their promise, at least on the surface. But beneath the veneer of efficiency lies a growing problem: the rise of junk leads.

Why Automation Delivers Volume—Not Always Value

Automated ad platforms are built to optimize for the goals you give them—most often, conversions. But not all conversions are created equal. When your campaign is set to maximize conversions, the algorithm chases the path of least resistance, seeking out the easiest opportunities to hit your targets. In practice, this often means prioritizing volume over quality.

If your conversion event is a form submission, for example, the platform doesn't know (or care) whether the lead is a real human with buying intent or a bot filling out forms for fun. As long as the conversion pixel fires, the machine learning model gets a "win." Over time, the algorithm learns that it can achieve your goals more easily by serving ads in placements or to audiences that are more likely to generate these low-quality conversions.

Sign up for free access to this post

Free members get access to complete blog posts like this one, plus exclusive Google Ads strategies and case studies.